politics

Mobility and accessibility

I have had the interesting experience of limited mobility recently after a foot fracture. Coupled with the snow that has got me thinking about access, and how hard we make life for people who have limited mobility. So many places have steps and it can be painful and difficult for people to access public buildings. Although it is gradually changing, the fact that people in London can't use every station is incredible in 2018 when disabled access has been expected since 1970.  

If we also think about accessibility in terms of the spoken word and hearing and seeing, the challenges are even greater. There are so many people who deny their hearing loss and then bluff, often missing quite a bit of what is being said. As trainers, we are very aware of sight and hearing loss issues but are not always prepared in advance for these which can create some challenges.

Services and public buildings are less prepared and disadvantage many people. There is unlikely to be progress on any of these issues while austerity cuts bite even harder up until 2020. New legislation that is not Brexit appears clogged up by Brexit so although the Government have accepted the Liberty Protection Safeguards in principle, we are stuck with DOLS and no new legislation for the foreseeable future at least.

Wood review of local safeguarding children boards

There has been a fair bit of publicity about the Children and Social Work Act 2017 with the changes to the professional journey of child care social workers. There has been far less comment about the implementation of the Wood review on Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCBs) and Serious Case Review (SCRs).  There will be no legal requirement to have a LSCB but there will be a requirement instead for safeguarding partners to work together to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. The partners are the local authority, Clinical Commissioning Group and the Police. 

SCRs as we now know them will cease. There will be about 20 cases of national importance reviewed by a central body - the Child Safeguarding Review Panel. All the other cases will be subject to local child safe practice reviews. These are meant to be low key and the reports will go to the central body. It will be interesting to see whether this does end up being less bureaucratic and repetitious. 

Dubs resettlement scheme ended by Commons vote

It's shocking that the Dubs refugee arrangement has quietly been ended with very little debate. The commitment to take 3000 young refugees has ended, with only 350 being brought into the country.

The Government has blamed the strapped resources of local authorities which implies they are not a direct result of the extreme cuts to public services which are affecting all provision by councils. There is a legal challenge to the decision on the Dubs refugees in the high court 2-4 May.